Toronto
Don Martin hosts Power Play on CTV News Channel, highlighting the people and players that dominate the political scene in Canada.


Don Martin's BioAbout Power Play

Don Martin on TwitterDon Martin on Twitter

Power Play on TwitterPower Play on Twitter

CTV Power Play on FacebookCTV Power Play on Facebook



FeedSubscribe


Share |


Howls over Lebel's BQ past are hard to justify

10. August 2011 05:17  by Don Martin

The media frenzy to track down federal politicians with separatist backgrounds has found fresh meat in a current Conservative cabinet minister with a Bloc Quebecois connection.

Transport Minister Denis Lebel held a seven-year BQ membership starting in 1993 until he turned Tory in 2001.

Gosh. Big deal.

The raised eyebrows over interim NDP leader Nycole Turmel’s flirtation with the BQ and provincial Quebec Solidaire party have, in my view, been easier to justify.

But howls from the NDP over Mr. Lebel’s decade-old BQ membership sound desperate and are curious because the party was silent when the precedent was set.

That happened when the Liberals recruited Bloc Quebecois founder Jean Lapierre to sit in, ironically, the Transport portfolio during Paul Martin’s reign.

Mr. Lapierre, who appears on Power Play as our expert eyes on Quebec politics every week, didn’t last long sitting with the BQ in the early 1990s before electing to return to his Liberal roots in 2004.

While Lapierre’s changed stripes rated occasional mention and he was forced to repledge his federalist loyalties periodically, it was never condemned with any NDP enthusiasm.

Yet the Dippers are out there today blasted the Conservatives as double-standard hypocrites after Prime Minister Stephen Harper dared to express concern at Turmel’s earlier separatist party favours.

It’s true Mr. Lebel sits around the powerful cabinet table, something Ms. Turmel will likely never do.

But MPs and MP wannabes have always had the flexibility to switch sides if their current party becomes intolerable to themselves or local voters.

Never mind conflicting party memberships, 17 MPs have switched party sections in the House of Commons since 2000 -- and most went on to be safely re-elected under a new political banner.

But party leaders, even interim types, are held to a higher standard which is beyond quibbling, particularly in the area of national unity. Nycole Turmel held three party memberships -- two of them with separatist sympathizers -- until earlier this year. That remains a legitimate source of consternation until Jack Layton takes back the party reins.

But for low-key Denis Lebel to shake loose from the separatist Bloc, which was extremely popular when he quit in 2001, to join what appeared to be the lost Conservative cause in Quebec is worth commending, not condemning.

Tags:

Comments (4) -

8/10/2011 4:14:44 PM #

Come on Don!! You are so pro-conservative it is embarrassing. You condem the NDP interm leader for the same affilation that you support your conservative buddy. Let's be Canadian, instead of the "Party of Division" which is the Conservative/Reform Party. The real victory is both these pervious BQ or PQ members have come to join parties that a represent wider groups of Canadians and let's celebrate the powers of compromise for both!!

Ron Svajlenko Canada |

8/10/2011 7:21:39 PM #

factual error #1: Denis Lebel DID NOT join the Conservatives (I guess you mean PCs?) in 2001.  Here is the quote from his spokeswoman: "He joined the Conservative Party in 2007 because of Stephen Harper's vision for the economy" www.theglobeandmail.com/.../
BTW, the Conservatives were NOT a lost cause in 2007.!

factual error #2: the Bloc was not "extremely popular in 2001" They were behind the Liberals in the polls! legermarketing.com/.../IVFEDEN_quebec.pdf

factual error #3: there are no "howls from the NDP over Mr. Lebel’s decade-old BQ membership" Pat Martin just said to leave him alone. All they want is equal treatment for Nycole Turmel, Jean Lapierre, Denis Lebel, e.t.c...
www.theglobeandmail.com/.../article2124917

With so many mistakes, there can be no analysis, just uninformed opinion.

Dan United States |

8/10/2011 8:33:46 PM #

I agree with Don. It is one thing for MPs to switch parties but it is quite another for a person holding membership in two separatist parties appointed as the leader interim or otherwise of the official opposition.

The other insult was the fact they hid her association with these two separatist parties until the Bloc exposed her and the media tracked down her current membership in the Quebec Solidaire movement which is even further left of the Bloc.

To try and equate Lebel and Bernier to the Turmel issue smacks of desparation.

I want Turmel to be asked if she loves Canada. Watch her squirm. If the question was good enough for Stephen Harper it is good enough for a separatist sympathizer.

hollinm Canada |

8/10/2011 8:57:31 PM #

Mr. Martin, your concluding sentence tells it all:
"But for low-key Denis Lebel to shake loose from the separatist Bloc, which was extremely popular when he quit in 2001, to join what appeared to be the lost Conservative cause in Quebec is worth commending, not condemning."

Ms. Turmel's explanation as to why she took out a membership in the Bloc is beyond silly, i.e. to help out a friend, incidentally a Bloc politician. Asked in a CJAD interview if she would similarly support a conservative friend, Ms. Turmel replied: "I would not support a friend that is a conservative, as an example, ever ever. That is clear."

One would expect that kind of answer -- I did it to help a friend -- from a member of a high school clique, not someone chosen to lead "Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition", even if temporarily.

Gabby in QC Canada |

Comments are closed