Toronto
Don Martin hosts Power Play on CTV News Channel, highlighting the people and players that dominate the political scene in Canada.


Don Martin's BioAbout Power Play

Don Martin on TwitterDon Martin on Twitter

Power Play on TwitterPower Play on Twitter

CTV Power Play on FacebookCTV Power Play on Facebook



FeedSubscribe


Share |


MacKay plucked to safety from chopper controversy

7. December 2011 20:27  by Don Martin

It’s chopper controversy down for Defence Minister Peter MacKay. He’s been hoisted into the clear by the only testimony that could save him from the political turbulence caused by his vacation rescue aboard a military helicopter.

The pilot who plucked him from a Newfoundland fishing lodge stepped forward today to salvage MacKay from his communications disaster by declaring it a “win-win” for the military and the minister.

The source is more impeccable than merely being an eyewitness to the exercise. As a retired commander of the search and rescue squadron, Maj. Stephen Reid has no reason to fall on a credibility sword for his former boss. And, bonus, he has enough bureaucratic experience to explain away some of those damning emails, which suggested MacKay was retrieved under the “guise” of a rescue exercise, as a headache-avoiding short cut through the military’s legendary red tape.

The only question left unanswered is why MacKay’s staff didn’t summon Reid to MacKay’s rescue long before those enterprising folks at iPolitics broke his story this morning. As Reid noted, he waited and watched MacKay’s stammering incomplete and inconsistent explanations on the file until he couldn’t stand it any longer and stepped forward.

Now, it’s not easy for me to ride to MacKay’s rescue on any issue.  The man has an irrational loathing of one former columnist who became a CTV politics show host. Yes, that would be me. Perhaps it had something to do with my biography on former girlfriend Belinda Stronach.

That aside, it’s only fair to point out that despite MacKay’s misleading spin and arrogant Commons demeanor, the notion he raised his hand to summon a search-and-rescue helicopter as his own big yellow taxi has lost its knock down punch. 

If the opposition parties refuse to throttle down their hysterical demands for MacKay’s apology or resignation, MacKay has plenty of high-calibre ammunition for return fire to make them look even more hysterical than usual in Question Period today.

In two sentences, Maj. Reid removed most of the political heat from the controversy.

“The flight would have been flown regardless of whether or not the minister was included because the squadron conducts two training events per day as part of a regular routine,” he declared. “In this case, a new flight engineer required hoist training, therefore the training intentions were well matched.”

So there you have it. It was a routine flight while MacKay’s hoist helped train a newbie looking for rescue experience and never dreaming it would include the Defence Minister.

It’s been a fun controversy to cover, exacerbated by horrible spin from a minister who used to excel at media relations, but there’s nothing more to see or say on this file. MacKay’s search for a rescue is over.

- Don Martin

Comments (12) -

12/7/2011 9:00:39 PM #

Mr. Martin you are right about one thing. The media and the opposition are hysterical. I doubt many Canadians care much about MacKays extraction by helicopter nor the explanation. They are busy living their lives and getting ready for Xmas.

However, Ottawa likes to play these games. The reason the public no longer gets upset about this stuff is because the opposition and some in the media go overboard in the rhetoric. Calling for his resignation. Please.

hollinm |

12/7/2011 9:12:59 PM #

This was a disgraceful abuse of resources any way you spin this.  Is there no ethics left anywhere in this government.  First Tony Clement and his 50 million dollar theft of funds from Border security and now this.  Stephen Harper campaigned hard against the Liberal sponsorship scandal (and rightly so) to become prime minister but he is certainly governing a party that has taken corruption to a whole new level.

Linda McCoy |

12/7/2011 10:27:00 PM #

If the most the media can pin on Peter McKay is a helicoptor flight which was a diverted training flight, he must be pretty clean.

But, I don't see any apologies to the so-called reporters covering this so-called story.  

Would it not have been a normal process for reporters to actually get off of their fat backsides and go out and get the story from the horse's mouth (In this case the horse in question was the actual pilot.).  

I think there's another, much bigger story behind this whole tempest in a teapot:  National Defence Headquarter is about to undergo a big staff reduction.  So, the comfortable civil servants dug through the files to find what they could toss to friendly media types.  They got the story about the CDS taking a plane to catch up with his family because he had to stay in Canada to attend a repatriation ceremony and this one on McKay.  Seems like what goes on at NDHQ is pretty clean if this is the most damning story the media can come up with.  

Bet you won't be apologizing to Mr. McKay anytime soon, Mr. Smarmy.

Jon Coates |

12/7/2011 10:55:13 PM #

This whole thing could have and should have been handled much more effectively by McKay and the Tories. If Mr. McKay had just stepped up from day one to own his actions and say, "yes, I did this and it was a bad error in judgement, and I apologize to both Canadians and our military. It wont happen again." It's the art of apologizing 101. It would have taken the steam out of any side attacks from the opposition, the media etc. AND he would have done what those David Letterman was able to do in the process....somehow use bad behavior/ judgement to increase others respect and trust in you via *GASP* honesty and the willingness to take your hits upfront. But he chose the deny, divert and partially own up route. How's that working for him??

marie |

12/7/2011 11:27:11 PM #

Stealth helicopter needed, cost no object ,for un-reported flights of fantasy

lee kenney |

12/7/2011 11:40:36 PM #

Kudos to Don Martin for at least revealing why he may not be the go to journo for matters concerning Mr. MacKay.

This entire recent infantile media imbroglio darkly reminds many of us of wafer-gate. This you may recall was when the media totally fabricated a religious gotcha against the conservative Prime Minister, who was attending a state funeral for a prominent Liberal. They inundated readers and TV viewers for weeks, with a full court press, by the media until it was proven to be.... totally untrue.

Randal |

12/7/2011 11:51:46 PM #

Mr Martin...the ongoing manufactured outrage being displayed by the opposition parties is nothing new.  I really tire of it and believe that when a "scandal" falls apart those throwing dirt should be called.  Let's face facts..the last true scandal was the Sponsorship scandal and it is likely that many who should have gone to jail dodged a really big bullet.   Pat Martin is right now ranting about the Wheat Board and breaking the law...again....sponsorship, sponsorship, sponsorship.  Get real.

N Miller |

12/8/2011 3:45:13 AM #

Reminds us of another week long media assault a few years ago which turned out to be just as phony....wafer-gate.

Randal |

12/8/2011 5:53:42 AM #

“In this case, a new flight engineer required hoist training, therefore the training intentions were well matched.”

Really, you mean this "new guy" got some practice time in hoisting the Minister of Defence. Next thing we'll hear is a fledgling brain surgeon will get to try out his skills on the on the Prime M!!

More BS!!

Norm |

12/8/2011 7:58:47 PM #

Major Reid's explanation sure came at a very convenient time.  Probably just a coincidence, right?

Doug Roberts |

12/9/2011 1:07:33 AM #

Why is it the minister's responsibility to clear up the mud brought up by lazy journalists who have no integrity to actually validate the veracity of their story?

Secondly, why can the media just claim "nothing to see here any more, we  effed up, sorry about that.  Tune in tomorrow for our next attempt at infamy, maybe we'll get it right..."

Nope.  True journalism is dead in Canada.  We are left with sensationalists.  Time to visit blogs on the life of amoebas.  At least it is credible.

Illo Neri |

12/10/2011 9:48:43 AM #

Referring to your Friday, Dec. 7th section on the Wheat Board we would just like to say that as farmers we will be glad to see the Board become optional.  The government intends to allow them to operate. It is the Wheat Board that claims it can't function without a monopoly.  If they offer us a good deal we will take it, if not we will go somewhere else and if they can't compete they should quit.  
Western Canadian farmers market their own canola, peas, lentils, and other crops with no diffiiculty and can certainly manage their milling wheat and malting barley which are the only two commodities under the control of the Wheat Board.
The money the Wheat Board has spent on an unapproved vote, countless advertising mailouts and legal attempts to stop the government action, all come out of the farmers profit and will be felt in the form of a diminished or non-existant final payment when this years* crop is tallied.
A letter from the Wheat Board received today tells us that if Billl C-18 passes the farmer electred representatives on the CWB Board will be fired.  We don't see why this is the case but they haven't really been representing our point of view anyway so too bad!
If the majority of farmers do want to keep the Wheat Board in it's present form (which we don't believe is the case)  they still have no right to force the rest of us to market according to their wishes.
Thank you for raising this issue on your show.

Gerry and Emilly Loberg   50 year farmers

Gerrry and Emily Loberg |

Pingbacks and trackbacks (1)+

Comments are closed